MOVIE
Beautiful Creatures
CAST
Alden Ehrenreich, Alice Englert
RATING
PG-13
RELEASE
February 14, 2013
DIRECTOR
Richard LaGravenese
STUDIO
Warner Bros. Pictures
RUNNING TIME
2 hours 4 minutes
STARS
***1/4
REVIEW:
With Valentine's Day literally just around the corner, many couples, both young and older than young, try to find a way to spend the day with their loved one and make a romantic day out of the occasion. Chances are that the girl end of the couple won't want to see 'A Good Day to Die Hard,' and the guy end of the couple won't want to go see 'Safe Haven.' Eliminating those two new releases, the only one that's left is 'Beautiful Creatures.' This movie is based on the first of four books in a series written by Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl, and from the trailers would look like just another 'Twilight' cash grab for teens to hoard money towards. It's somewhat exciting to say that a movie that looks like a 'Twilight' ripoff is far from that, and even surpasses that series in terms of quality. As surprising as it is to say this, 'Beautiful Creatures' is basically any teen fantasy story but with better characters, a better script, and a story that the audience can get somewhat involved in. It's nice to find that Valentine's Day surprise when one least expects it.
Ethan is a relatively popular teenager who wants to escape his small town in South Carolina and explore the world the way his mother wanted him to. Lena just moved to this small town in South Carolina and is considered to be a freak due to being related to a man who's considered to be evil. The two, unexplainably, are connected to each other and fall in love. Lena though has a little secret that prevents the two from being together: Lena is a witch, or in the proper term, "a Castor." When Lena turns 16, her witchy powers will be claimed to either the light side of magic or the dark side of magic, which could turn her vile and evil. The love between the two teens sparks up an old curse that was put on her family centuries ago, and could jeopardize where her powers will eventually be claimed.
When people look at the poster for this film, chances are that they'll only recognize the supporting actors rather than the two leads. Alden Ehrenreich and Alice Englert are practically unknowns and aren't that recognizable to people just yet. Having said that, their performances were much better than one would expect. Not only do the actors have some decent chemistry together, but they also know how to add the teen angst element to their characters and make their love towards one another somewhat believable. Sure Englert, the girl who plays Lena, doesn't look like a 15 going on 16 year old at all, but that's onyl a nitpick compared to her performance overall. As for the supporting actors, nobody really disappointed on giving a decent performance.
Out of all of the supporting actors in the film, the best of them by far is Viola Davis. She's the only one of all of the actors who doesn't sport a Southern accent at all. Plus for what it's worth, it seems that she was giving the most effort out of all of the supporting actors. Thomas Mann from 'Project X' and 'Fun Size' was decent in this movie, but wasn't in it much in order to solidify a satisfactory performance. Jeremy Irons is good in anything he's in, but here it seems that he wasn't giving as great of an effort as Davis, or even Mann, was. Emmy Rossum is only in here to be a sex symbol and look incredibly attractive, which she succeeds at doing. Overall though, she doesn't really deliver on a good performance much and just really likes to flaunt around and look hot. Emma Thompson is the most mediocre of all of the actors since her performance is silly and way too over the top for what could have been a decent villain. The supporting performance average out to decent, with some that were good, and some that were mediocre. It's kind of ironic how the two unknown leads deliver better performances than the majority of the well known supporting actors.
The direction from Richard LaGravenese wasn't anything special, since it just felt standard and nothing really remarkable. His script though I did admire mainly because of its quirky dialogue. Watching the film, I thought to myself "this is like 'Twilight' with a better script and much more likable characters." Some of the dialogue in the movie was very entertaining to listen too and had a sort of flare to it, unlike 'Broken City' in which it tried to mock off the style of Quentin Tarantino. The story might be a little predictable, but the chemistry between the characters and their constant banter between each other made the film worthwhile.
Overall, 'Beautiful Creatures' is a better movie than one would expect from the trailers and the story. If one can ignore the over the top performance from Emma Thompson, the predictable and formulaic story, and annoying Christian characters present throughout, then this is a decent time at the movies. The two leads have good chemistry together and are likable presences on the screen. The script is enjoyable since it has a nice charm and spunk to it that makes it stand out among other fantasy scripts. Sure the supporting cast doesn't stand out, but they are enjoyable for what it's worth. This isn't the best date movie out: 'Warm Bodies' is by far. However if your girlfriend doesn't want to see 'A Good Day to Die Hard' on Valentine's Day, then this isn't a terrible option. While not a perfect movie, 'Beautiful Creatures' is a fluffy and enjoyable teen fantasy with enough charm to satisfy the teen girl in all of us.
The Official Blog of Philadelphia/South Jersey's Youngest Cinephile, as well as WeLiveFilm critic, Zachary S. Marsh.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Monday, February 4, 2013
REVIEW: Warm Bodies
MOVIE
Warm Bodies
CAST
Nicholas Hoult, Teresa Palmer
RATING
PG-13
RELEASE
February 1, 2013
DIRECTOR
Jonathan Levine
STUDIO
Summit Entertainment
(Lionsgate)
RUNNING TIME
1 hour 38 minutes
STARS
***3/4
REVIEW:
At first glance, 'Warm Bodies' seems like a straight up 'Twilight' ripoff, but this time it's about zombies in the post apocalyptic future rather than vampires in a rural part of Washington State. Instead of the film just being a simple love story between an immortal being and a regular human girl, it actually takes the ideas of the apocalypse, zombies, and love, and puts a fresh spin on it. The story of 'Warm Bodies' follows a zombie who goes by the name "R" who is conflicted with eating humans. He doesn't want to, but he has to in order to survive and feels bad about it after. R soon comes across a human named Julie whom he for really fascinating reasons becomes attracted to her and feels obligated to protect her from his fellow zombies, as well as the "bonies," who are a more vicious and carnivorous type of zombie. Since the director of the film was Jonathan Levine, who directed the 2011 dramady '50/50,' I had faith that this film would be good. Sure enough, it is exactly what I wanted it to be and more. 'Warm Bodies' is an intelligent, hilarious, and touching romantic comedy that can be enjoyed by anyone who has a pulse.
The real standout of the film is Nicholas Hoult as R. The only other film I can recall seeing him in recently was 2011's 'X-Men: First Class,' and he was great in it. Hoult's performance as R is played more for comedy, yet it also features a deeper performance than I was expecting. What I mean by that is that there is a kind of complexity to Hoult's character since he's mostly using his inner monologue as dialogue, showing that he is a human trapped in a zombie's body. Teresa Palmer adds a substance to her "damsel" character and acts more as an intelligent badass rather than a clumsy damsel captured by the "beast." Rod Corrdry delivers on some hilarious comedic moments as well, along with 'Crazy Stupid Love's' Analeigh Tipton. Dave Franco and John Malkovich deliver in strong supporting roles as well. Overall 'Warm Bodies' features a great cast that features a really strong performance from a potentially big star, Nicholas Hoult. If anyone should be given credit to the film, however, it should go to writer/director Jonathan Levine.
To be honest, I've never read the book 'Warm Bodies,' which the movie is based off of. However from what I've read of the book, it seems that Jonathan Levine stayed true to it and even enhanced it in some ways. Not only is the dialogue sharp and often hilarious, but the story itself is presented with so many unique and clever ideas that I'm shocked haven't been thought of before. One of those ideas is that zombies try to eat human brains in order to gain the memories of the now deceased. Levine even manages to make William Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' relevant once again and have an interesting twist on the story. This story doesn't exactly copy off of the classic forbidden love tale, but it does allude to it in some interesting ways. After seeing the film, I am tempted to read the original book of 'Warm Bodies' and compare the book and movie to see what's different about them. Just know that this zombie love tale is much funnier and more unique than one might expect.
Valentine's Day is literally around the corner, and so many sappy romantic dramas will be coming out for girlfriends to drag their boyfriends to. Luckily if the boyfriend is dragged to see 'Warm Bodies,' chances are that they will probably have a really good time. The film itself isn't sappy at all. Rather, it's hilarious and awesome overall. The performances are great, especially from Nicholas Hoult. The script by Jonathan Levine is clever and sharp as a pitchfork in terms of dialogue. For a 98 minute movie, the film never feels too short or too long. Just go along for the ride and you may have a good time. 'Warm Bodies' is that mixture of 'Twilight,' 'Romeo and Juliet,' and 'Zombieland' that shouldn't work, but thanks to the writing and direction of Jonathan Levine, work really well together. Who would have guessed that a movie about dead zombie who falls in love would actually have the brain and the pulse to actually work?
PREVIEWS YOU MAY SEE:
Safe Haven
Jack The Giant Slayer
Oblivion
Now You See Me
The Heat
Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor
Warm Bodies
CAST
Nicholas Hoult, Teresa Palmer
RATING
PG-13
RELEASE
February 1, 2013
DIRECTOR
Jonathan Levine
STUDIO
Summit Entertainment
(Lionsgate)
RUNNING TIME
1 hour 38 minutes
STARS
***3/4
REVIEW:
At first glance, 'Warm Bodies' seems like a straight up 'Twilight' ripoff, but this time it's about zombies in the post apocalyptic future rather than vampires in a rural part of Washington State. Instead of the film just being a simple love story between an immortal being and a regular human girl, it actually takes the ideas of the apocalypse, zombies, and love, and puts a fresh spin on it. The story of 'Warm Bodies' follows a zombie who goes by the name "R" who is conflicted with eating humans. He doesn't want to, but he has to in order to survive and feels bad about it after. R soon comes across a human named Julie whom he for really fascinating reasons becomes attracted to her and feels obligated to protect her from his fellow zombies, as well as the "bonies," who are a more vicious and carnivorous type of zombie. Since the director of the film was Jonathan Levine, who directed the 2011 dramady '50/50,' I had faith that this film would be good. Sure enough, it is exactly what I wanted it to be and more. 'Warm Bodies' is an intelligent, hilarious, and touching romantic comedy that can be enjoyed by anyone who has a pulse.
The real standout of the film is Nicholas Hoult as R. The only other film I can recall seeing him in recently was 2011's 'X-Men: First Class,' and he was great in it. Hoult's performance as R is played more for comedy, yet it also features a deeper performance than I was expecting. What I mean by that is that there is a kind of complexity to Hoult's character since he's mostly using his inner monologue as dialogue, showing that he is a human trapped in a zombie's body. Teresa Palmer adds a substance to her "damsel" character and acts more as an intelligent badass rather than a clumsy damsel captured by the "beast." Rod Corrdry delivers on some hilarious comedic moments as well, along with 'Crazy Stupid Love's' Analeigh Tipton. Dave Franco and John Malkovich deliver in strong supporting roles as well. Overall 'Warm Bodies' features a great cast that features a really strong performance from a potentially big star, Nicholas Hoult. If anyone should be given credit to the film, however, it should go to writer/director Jonathan Levine.
To be honest, I've never read the book 'Warm Bodies,' which the movie is based off of. However from what I've read of the book, it seems that Jonathan Levine stayed true to it and even enhanced it in some ways. Not only is the dialogue sharp and often hilarious, but the story itself is presented with so many unique and clever ideas that I'm shocked haven't been thought of before. One of those ideas is that zombies try to eat human brains in order to gain the memories of the now deceased. Levine even manages to make William Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' relevant once again and have an interesting twist on the story. This story doesn't exactly copy off of the classic forbidden love tale, but it does allude to it in some interesting ways. After seeing the film, I am tempted to read the original book of 'Warm Bodies' and compare the book and movie to see what's different about them. Just know that this zombie love tale is much funnier and more unique than one might expect.
Valentine's Day is literally around the corner, and so many sappy romantic dramas will be coming out for girlfriends to drag their boyfriends to. Luckily if the boyfriend is dragged to see 'Warm Bodies,' chances are that they will probably have a really good time. The film itself isn't sappy at all. Rather, it's hilarious and awesome overall. The performances are great, especially from Nicholas Hoult. The script by Jonathan Levine is clever and sharp as a pitchfork in terms of dialogue. For a 98 minute movie, the film never feels too short or too long. Just go along for the ride and you may have a good time. 'Warm Bodies' is that mixture of 'Twilight,' 'Romeo and Juliet,' and 'Zombieland' that shouldn't work, but thanks to the writing and direction of Jonathan Levine, work really well together. Who would have guessed that a movie about dead zombie who falls in love would actually have the brain and the pulse to actually work?
PREVIEWS YOU MAY SEE:
Safe Haven
Jack The Giant Slayer
Oblivion
Now You See Me
The Heat
Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor
Thursday, January 31, 2013
The Best and Worst Movies of 2012
It took me a while to finally come up with a list for my favorite and least favorite films of 2012. There were many films that I loved, liked, and hated over the last 12 months, so let's get to it. Remember these are just my opinions, and you are free to disagree or agree with my thoughts on these films. Anyways, here is my list of favorite and least favorite movies of 2012.
OVERRATED MOVIES OF 2012: (In No Order)
UNDERRATED MOVIES OF 2012: (In No Order)
WORST OF 2012:
"Honorable" Mentions (In No Order)
6. The Watch
2. Joyful Noise
BEST OF 2012:
Honorable Mentions (In No Order)
8. The Grey
5. The Intouchables
4. Les Misérables
3. Marvel's The Avengers
2. Silver Linings Playbook

1. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
So there you have it: my best and worst of 2012. hope you liked my list, and hopefully 2013 can be an even better year than 2012 was, despite 2012 being a fantastic year for film. Thanks for reading my blog for over 4 years everyone, it truly means so much to me!
OVERRATED MOVIES OF 2012: (In No Order)
UNDERRATED MOVIES OF 2012: (In No Order)
WORST OF 2012:
"Honorable" Mentions (In No Order)
6. The Watch
2. Joyful Noise
1. Red Tails
BEST OF 2012:
Honorable Mentions (In No Order)
10. Ruby Sparks
8. The Grey
5. The Intouchables
4. Les Misérables
3. Marvel's The Avengers
2. Silver Linings Playbook
1. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
So there you have it: my best and worst of 2012. hope you liked my list, and hopefully 2013 can be an even better year than 2012 was, despite 2012 being a fantastic year for film. Thanks for reading my blog for over 4 years everyone, it truly means so much to me!
Monday, January 28, 2013
REVIEW: Zero Dark Thirty
MOVIE
Zero Dark Thirty
CAST
Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke
RATING
R
RELEASE
December 19, 2012 (NY/LA)
January 11, 2013 (WIDE)
DIRECTOR
Kathryn Bigelow
STUDIO(S)
Columbia Pictures,
Annapurna Pictures
RUNNING TIME
2 hours 37 minutes
STARS
****
REVIEW:
I remember the day when President Obama announced that Osama Bin Laden had been killed by SEAL Team Six who raided on his compound in Abbottabad. Knowing that the man responsible for that fatal day in 2001 had finally been obliterated from the earth was both a perplexing and interesting feeling to myself since I had only known of this man as the guy who caused 9/11 and that he was a terrorist. Seeing 'Zero Dark Thirty' gave me a different perspective on what's being advertised as "the greatest manhunt in history." It's one thing to know that the US Government has been hunting Bin Laden for over a decade. It's another thing to see the CIA torture, kill, and argue with terrorists in some of the sickest ways imaginable. Along with sublime acting, a powerful story/final 45 minutes, and a feeling of never being "safe" from an attack throughout the film makes 'Zero Dark Thirty' an empowering and incredible piece of filmmaking that should be seen for years to come.
It's hard to judge who gave the best performance in the film since one actor stole the show in the first hour of the film, while another actor stole the show for the rest of the film. The actor who stole the show in the first hour of this movie was Jason Clarke. In the first half hour of the film it's shown that Clarke's character Dan interrogates his prisoners who are believed to have worked with Bin Laden in the attacks by torturing them in a brutal way involving water. What's great about Clarke's character is how he tortures the prisoners. The way he does it makes the performance more believable and the overall effect more powerful. In my opinion I strongly think that Clarke was snubbed at the Oscars because of his empowering performance. Hell, he was much more entertaining than Alan "Argo F**k Yourself" Arkin for 'Argo' which he got nominated for. Hopefully Clarke gets another chance soon to wow the Academy and audiences everywhere really soon.
The second half of the movie was stolen by Jessica Chastain's performances as Maya, the woman who in the end is responsible for finding the location of Osama Bin Laden. The film for the most part follows Maya's experiences in trying to find Bin Laden, which includes learning how to interrogate foreign terrorists into finding him. Like I said prior, Clarke steals the first hour of the film with his ferocious and gripping performance. However once he "leaves" the film to have a smaller role, Chastain comes thundering in and gives a performance that electrifies what would have been really boring dialogue sequences. There is one scene in particular where she's arguing with Kyle Chandler about something involving Bin Laden that is incredibly powerful and effective overall. Even the final scene of the film shows how great of an actress Chastain really is. As for best female performance of the year, I still believe that Jennifer Lawrence occupies that slot for 'Silver Linings Playbook.' However if Chastain gets all of the gold during awards season, I won't be disappointed at all. This is a performance that makes actresses A-listers.
As for the rest of the performances of the film, everyone did a great job. Mark Strong is fantastic from the first minute he shows up, and overall gives an effective performance that shows how good of an actor he really is. Kyle Chandler never fails to disappoint, and this movie is no exception to that. Even though it's not a groundbreaking performance, Chandler still gives it his all and delivers a solid performance. Chris Pratt and Joel Edgerton show up for the final 45 minutes of the film and deliver on being entertaining soldiers that carry the big raid scene with force. James Gandolfini and Mark Duplass even have small roles in the movie and are overall good. There isn't a single nit pick I can make about this cast because everyone delivered on solid performances. As great as all of the actors were, the true star of the film is in fact Kathryn Bigelow.
I've only seen clips from Bigelow's Oscar winning flick 'The Hurt Locker,' but I could tell from what I saw that she is a very talented director. What she brings to this movie is a film that perfectly balances acting and in room drama with intense torture and terrorist situations that makes the audience never feel safe to an extent. The final raid scene at Bin Laden's compound, though not quite as heart pounding as the final half hour of 'Argo' for example, is intense and keeps the audience on the edge of their seats. Everything about this film in general soars. The script is great and never feels draggy at all. The acting is stellar, especially from Chastain, Clarke, and Strong. Bigelow's direction keeps the audience involved and giving us the feeling that there could be someone at any time willing to bomb an army base or a restaraunt as examples. If you haven't seen 'Zero Dark Thirty' yet, then what's keeping you? All of the controversy about the torture bound opening 30 minutes is all a bunch of bull. Nothing is really gruesome or bloody at all. The reason why it's supposedly hard to watch is because regular people wouldn't want to see others humiliated and sufficated through "waterboarding." If you can handle that, along with a dialogue heavy film with not a lot of action, then see this film as soon as possible, because it is without a doubt one of 2012's most empowering films.
PREVIEWS YOU MAY SEE:
The Place Beyond The Pines
Side Effects
42
Oblivion
The Call
Zero Dark Thirty
CAST
Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke
RATING
R
RELEASE
December 19, 2012 (NY/LA)
January 11, 2013 (WIDE)
DIRECTOR
Kathryn Bigelow
STUDIO(S)
Columbia Pictures,
Annapurna Pictures
RUNNING TIME
2 hours 37 minutes
STARS
****
REVIEW:
I remember the day when President Obama announced that Osama Bin Laden had been killed by SEAL Team Six who raided on his compound in Abbottabad. Knowing that the man responsible for that fatal day in 2001 had finally been obliterated from the earth was both a perplexing and interesting feeling to myself since I had only known of this man as the guy who caused 9/11 and that he was a terrorist. Seeing 'Zero Dark Thirty' gave me a different perspective on what's being advertised as "the greatest manhunt in history." It's one thing to know that the US Government has been hunting Bin Laden for over a decade. It's another thing to see the CIA torture, kill, and argue with terrorists in some of the sickest ways imaginable. Along with sublime acting, a powerful story/final 45 minutes, and a feeling of never being "safe" from an attack throughout the film makes 'Zero Dark Thirty' an empowering and incredible piece of filmmaking that should be seen for years to come.
It's hard to judge who gave the best performance in the film since one actor stole the show in the first hour of the film, while another actor stole the show for the rest of the film. The actor who stole the show in the first hour of this movie was Jason Clarke. In the first half hour of the film it's shown that Clarke's character Dan interrogates his prisoners who are believed to have worked with Bin Laden in the attacks by torturing them in a brutal way involving water. What's great about Clarke's character is how he tortures the prisoners. The way he does it makes the performance more believable and the overall effect more powerful. In my opinion I strongly think that Clarke was snubbed at the Oscars because of his empowering performance. Hell, he was much more entertaining than Alan "Argo F**k Yourself" Arkin for 'Argo' which he got nominated for. Hopefully Clarke gets another chance soon to wow the Academy and audiences everywhere really soon.
The second half of the movie was stolen by Jessica Chastain's performances as Maya, the woman who in the end is responsible for finding the location of Osama Bin Laden. The film for the most part follows Maya's experiences in trying to find Bin Laden, which includes learning how to interrogate foreign terrorists into finding him. Like I said prior, Clarke steals the first hour of the film with his ferocious and gripping performance. However once he "leaves" the film to have a smaller role, Chastain comes thundering in and gives a performance that electrifies what would have been really boring dialogue sequences. There is one scene in particular where she's arguing with Kyle Chandler about something involving Bin Laden that is incredibly powerful and effective overall. Even the final scene of the film shows how great of an actress Chastain really is. As for best female performance of the year, I still believe that Jennifer Lawrence occupies that slot for 'Silver Linings Playbook.' However if Chastain gets all of the gold during awards season, I won't be disappointed at all. This is a performance that makes actresses A-listers.
As for the rest of the performances of the film, everyone did a great job. Mark Strong is fantastic from the first minute he shows up, and overall gives an effective performance that shows how good of an actor he really is. Kyle Chandler never fails to disappoint, and this movie is no exception to that. Even though it's not a groundbreaking performance, Chandler still gives it his all and delivers a solid performance. Chris Pratt and Joel Edgerton show up for the final 45 minutes of the film and deliver on being entertaining soldiers that carry the big raid scene with force. James Gandolfini and Mark Duplass even have small roles in the movie and are overall good. There isn't a single nit pick I can make about this cast because everyone delivered on solid performances. As great as all of the actors were, the true star of the film is in fact Kathryn Bigelow.
I've only seen clips from Bigelow's Oscar winning flick 'The Hurt Locker,' but I could tell from what I saw that she is a very talented director. What she brings to this movie is a film that perfectly balances acting and in room drama with intense torture and terrorist situations that makes the audience never feel safe to an extent. The final raid scene at Bin Laden's compound, though not quite as heart pounding as the final half hour of 'Argo' for example, is intense and keeps the audience on the edge of their seats. Everything about this film in general soars. The script is great and never feels draggy at all. The acting is stellar, especially from Chastain, Clarke, and Strong. Bigelow's direction keeps the audience involved and giving us the feeling that there could be someone at any time willing to bomb an army base or a restaraunt as examples. If you haven't seen 'Zero Dark Thirty' yet, then what's keeping you? All of the controversy about the torture bound opening 30 minutes is all a bunch of bull. Nothing is really gruesome or bloody at all. The reason why it's supposedly hard to watch is because regular people wouldn't want to see others humiliated and sufficated through "waterboarding." If you can handle that, along with a dialogue heavy film with not a lot of action, then see this film as soon as possible, because it is without a doubt one of 2012's most empowering films.
PREVIEWS YOU MAY SEE:
The Place Beyond The Pines
Side Effects
42
Oblivion
The Call
REVIEW: Stand Up Guys
Stand Up Guys
CAST
Al Pacino, Christopher Walken
RATING
R
RELEASE
December 14, 2012 (NY/LA)
February 1, 2013
DIRECTOR
Fisher Stevens
STUDIO
Lionsgate
RUNNING TIME
1 hour 34 minutes
STARS
****
ORIGINALLY POSTED ON OCTOBER 31, 2012
AS A PART OF THE PHILADELPHIA FILM FESTIVAL
REVIEW:
Damn is the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of this movie. 'Stand Up Guys' just had its world premiere a few weeks ago, and looks to not be screened for people until the beginning of 2013, which is when the movie gets released, courtesy of Lionsgate. This film stars Al Pacino, Christopher Walken, and Alan Arkin as a group of criminals who want one last night out inspired by the good old days before one of them has to be executed. The trailer personally didn't wow me like I was hoping it would, but I still thought the film looked interesting. To my surprise, this movie was more than interesting, to say the least. 'Stand Up Guys' is funny, heartfelt at times, action-packed when necessary, and overall a whole lot of fun.
The three leads of the film all stand out in their own way. Al Pacino delivers a great performance that is both charming and hilarious. Pacino's performance in this proves that he still has it, despite being in a few action movies over the past few years. Equally as great is Christopher Walken, who is a nice presence to have in here. Just like Pacino, he's charming and hilarious. However Walken's character has a lot more heart than one would expect from the trailer, which I was pleasantly surprised by. Alan Arkin is just hilarious in his small role in the film. He's shown to be the badass ladies’ man that just happens to live in a retirement home under the mask of an oxygen tank. The best part of these three performances is that none of them outshine each other. They all steal the film in their own way, which I personally loved to see. Even the supporting actors in the movie are great, but none of them can be compared to the three main leads.
The best aspect about the movie is the screenplay/story. All of the events shown in the movie happen over the course of one day, which means the audience is following these characters on their last day of being old friends. The three leads meet many characters over the duration of the movie, and luckily none of the small characters over stay their welcome. Of all of the small characters, the one with the biggest part is a waitress at a cafe, but even her story is resolved in its own way, and the way it was couldn't have been done any better. The thing that may have people scratching their heads in the film is the ending of the movie, which it's supposed to do. It's more of an interpretation ending, ala 'Inception' or 'The Soprano's,' and once again, I loved it. This screenplay isn't meant to be an awards qualifying script, but I just absolutely loved it.
'Stand Up Guys' isn't meant to be an awards player this season, unless one is thinking about the Golden Globes. This is the type of movie where one should go to so they can see three Academy Award winners have the time of their lives. The acting is great, the story keeps the audience intrigued throughout, and the script is much better than one would expect. The film gets raunchy at times, but it never goes over the top like many of this year's R rated comedies get. When this film becomes available, I'd highly recommend checking this out. 'Stand Up Guys' is funny, fresh, and flat-out fun that I cannot wait to revisit when it comes out in theaters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















